Skip to main content

Reply to "Federal efforts to “consider” bridging national: research, practice, policy, in Health Care"

Andre Picard, explains the political context of the report.  https://www.theglobeandmail.co...ed+Web+Article+Links

...

It is also clear that, in all the scenarios, three organizations come out big losers: the Mental Health Commission of Canada, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and Addiction.

Dr. Martin said it is not because issues such as cancer, mental health and addiction are unimportant – on the contrary, these problems are so pervasive they need to be tackled on a broader scale, not merely by small, stand-alone organizations. ...


I'd advocate that Accreditation Canada https://accreditation.ca/  be figured into this, maybe it is in the report and I missed it? 

It is such a key driver of  individual organizations trying to measure and improve themselves and have front line: worker, client, family, manager, community -- involvement and inter-exchange.  It would benefit from a greater focus beyond itself, yes it's practically a creature unto itself; if we are to have a whole system approach.

 

Last edited by Registered Member
CAMH Logo

This website has been funded by a grant from the Government of Ontario.
The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Ontario.
×
×
×
×