I would 'urge caution', as most professions have their own unique biases and 'esoterics'. The substance abuse field, as a profession, may not concur with the 'Public health Model's promoted by Canadian Physicians such as Gabor Mate, or those noted in Vincent Felitti, M.D.'s 2004 paper: "The Origins of Addiction: Evidence from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study". Prioritizing Evidence, may favor the professionals who avail it, rather than the "Consumers", "Persons-With-Lived- Experience", and "Just Folk". If Everyone's 'Evidence' is included, rather than being subject to 'Priority Agenda'.... Am I acting like a Librarian ? (Especially, like one who hasn't [yet] read: "Get the Full Report here" ? ? ?