Skip to main content

of the Center for the Human Rights of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry http://www.chrusp.org/ in this article frames the initiative through a reparations approach and includes a call for sharing the experience.

It also helps us to think more about current practices of institutionalization despite all of our intentions on community based care.  I know many groups in Ontario have been working to shine a light on this, even in recent years, in the context of homelessness and housing etc.  Does anyone know if they are linking with this report?

chrusp_logo

.. The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has announced a series of regional consultations on deinstitutionalization, starting with one for Central Asia and Eastern Europe on February 25 and a second for Central and South America on March 1.  The other regions will follow.  You can read all the details in an information note here.

This is an important opportunity for survivors of psychiatric oppression (if you are still alive and struggling as a current victim, I consider you a survivor, along with those who have gotten out) and our allies to make sure we are heard.

Victim’s perspective or system’s perspective?

Too often ‘deinstitutionalization’ has meant community-based mental health services, instead of freedom and acceptance, instead of recognition that we return from hell as survivors, that ‘survivor’ isn’t a euphemism.  Deinstitutionalization initiatives tend to take a service-provider point of view, seeking to rearrange their own territory in response to criticism of severe and egregious abuses.  We need instead to start from the perspective of victimized persons, acknowledging that the human rights violations go wide and deep, that they are systemic and cannot be rooted out unless we unseat the ‘service providers’ who have as a class been the perpetrators of these violations from directing repair.  Similar to the approach of feminists who insist on the personhood of female human beings – autonomous, not the negation of males or their perspectives but something entirely different – we need to start as victims of psychiatric oppression, looking at our reality – as individuals as collectively in our countries, localities, communities – and naming both the violations and what we want as remedies.

Of course our movement has been doing this since its beginnings, and we now have the excellent resource from our early days as a liberation movement, ...

Please see the article here: https://www.madinamerica.com/2...Evgi6Gpef0tlLx0NKLdk

Attachments

Images (1)
  • chrusp_logo
Last edited by Registered Member
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Registered Member posted:

Thank you, Bill.  This is fantastic and energising!

@Registered Member, I know what you mean by energizing, I take it as a regrouping of sorts, some kind of rise above the fray.   Fray not meaning to dismiss all the hard work being done to "change" but to keep checking our actions - high level talk meets the: people, front line (i know people don't like that term), community efforts. 

It sure would be useful to strengthen and integrate this focus on: rights, law with the planning and actions: Governance of health and social care.  Again, would be useful to hear from people who are working at such levels, but I find usually ineffective to wish for others working at higher levels to take action.

keep on washin,

Bill

Update on Global Coalition on Deinstitutionalization  from Tina Minkowitz, Esq.;

"guidelines were adopted"

There is a new comment to CRPD Consultation on Deinstitutionalization: A Reparations Approach.
Comment Link: https://www.madinamerica.com/2021/02/crpd-reparations-approach/#comment-204160
Author: Tina Minkowitz, Esq.
Comment:
I'm coming back to this post to let readers know that the Guidelines were adopted by the CRPD Committee on Sept 9, 2022. The result has met many of my hopes and expectations - most particularly, leading colleagues involved in the Global Coalition on Deinstitutionalization characterize the Guidelines as taking as a 'reparations' or 'reparative justice' approach as a whole. There is a substantial section on reparations and repeated reference to 'survivors of institutionalization' as the key constituency along with those whose rights are currently being violated by institutionalization. Please see here to read the Guidelines: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/legal-standards-and-guidelines/crpdc5-guidelines-deinstitutionalization-including (Note:

Permalink: https://www.madinamerica.com/2021/02/crpd-reparations-approach/

Add Reply

Post
CAMH Logo

This website has been funded by a grant from the Government of Ontario.
The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Ontario.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×