Skip to main content

There are several teams that also have a broader program component of intensive case management and used the ATR at intake.  Though the scale was originally developed based on ACTT, it seems to make sense that it could provide guidance in both directions. Gary Cuddeback would like to hear from the teams who are using it this way and it would be great to hear at this site as well, at least who is using the scale in this way.

 

For sure our program at Step-down from ACT uses it and client scores differentiate our kind of program, compared to ACTT in a clear manner.

Last edited by Registered Member
Original Post

For further discussion, please see Francios Neveu's comments below linked to another post.

EPLY

Re: ATR / Transition and Flow Report for Champlain LHIN

FRANCOIS NEVEU ·
Hi everyone, My name is François Neveu and i work for the center of excellence in the province of Quebec. Our goal is to promote best practices in all ACT and ICM teams of the province. We took time to study the ATR transition scale and here's our thoughts: All the members took time to read the reports and study ATR items. We find that’s a tool who seem to work well with clinicians because the items are pretty easy to understand and the reports showed good results for the persons who have...
 
From section of his comment.
...We find that the ATR is a good tool to guide clinician from ACT and ICM teams to discharge peoples from their services to light support. The cutoff score seems to work well and we’re confident that peoples won’t be coming back in a near future. But, we’re not so sure that the ATR is precise enough to help us to clearly make difference between people in ACT or ICM teams. ...
Last edited by Registered Member

Add Reply

CAMH Logo

This website has been funded by a grant from the Government of Ontario.
The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Ontario.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×